Introduction

The purpose of history taking in psychiatry — sometimes called the Assessment Interview — is to gather factual information, elicit the signs and symptoms of the presenting disorder along with the patient's feelings and emotions, and, most importantly, to establish a rapport and therapeutic alliance with the patient. The therapeutic alliance refers to the collaborative working relationship between clinician and patient; it is one of the strongest predictors of treatment engagement and outcome across all psychiatric conditions.

The success of a psychiatric assessment interview depends on how well the doctor communicates with the patient, how readily the doctor can relax their own manner and thus help to relax the patient. Despite the time constraints of NHS practice, the skilled clinician makes the patient feel that they have all the time in the world and that the patient is the most important person in that moment.

Whereas certain specific question sets must be asked of almost every patient, the interview must not be followed in a rigid manner. Ultimately, a successful session leaves the patient feeling satisfied, with some hope for recovery and trust in their treating physician.

In medicine and especially in psychiatry, the quality of communication between patient and doctor is positively correlated with the accuracy of the diagnosis made, the patient's understanding of the information given, and adherence to the prescribed treatment. A patient's dissatisfaction with their consultation often results in a poor clinical outcome and, for some, prompts the start of litigation against the doctor. Essentially, a patient must always leave the consulting room feeling better than when they arrived.

This article is written primarily for medical students who are increasingly encouraged to interview as many patients as possible during their clinical years of training. It is good practice to observe accomplished physicians' style and to learn the art of eliciting key signs and symptoms — and, more importantly, how they respond verbally and non-verbally to patients' complaints, feelings, and expressed emotions during the interview.

How Psychiatric History Taking Differs from a Standard Medical Clerking

In most branches of medicine, history taking focuses primarily on biological symptoms — onset, duration, character, associated features, aggravating and relieving factors, and systemic review. In psychiatry, all of these remain important, but several additional dimensions are central:

  • Life events and psychosocial context — psychiatric symptoms are often precipitated, perpetuated, or shaped by life circumstances. Understanding these is essential to both diagnosis and management.
  • Developmental and personal history — childhood experiences, education, relationships, and occupational history provide crucial context for understanding a person's vulnerabilities and strengths.
  • Premorbid personality — understanding how a person was before they became unwell helps to establish what the treatment target should be (i.e. recovery to their premorbid level) and informs management.
  • Collateral history — independent accounts from family members, carers, or other professionals are often essential in psychiatry, where insight (the patient's awareness of their own illness) may be impaired.
  • Continuous mental state observation — unlike a standard examination that follows history taking, the mental state examination in psychiatry begins the moment you see the patient and continues throughout the interview. Your observations during history taking are a fundamental part of the assessment.

Key Points in History Taking

From here on, this article deals with the key headings of history taking. The art of the interview itself is described in Part 3 of this series.

As in any other branch of medicine, we are essentially concerned with the history of the presenting problems and arriving at a working clinical diagnosis. This is followed by relevant investigations to confirm the most likely diagnosis and exclude other possibilities, then by treatment appropriate to the disorder.

In psychiatry, the presenting symptoms are often influenced by various life events, current social circumstances, support networks, and relationships with parents, siblings, partners, and children. As elsewhere in medicine, family history and past medical history are important not only in making the diagnosis but also in planning management.

Most significantly, the patient's developmental and personal history, cultural background, and family and religious values will influence and modify the presenting symptoms and how those factors are perceived by the patient and their family and caregivers. Lastly, it is the patient's attitude and premorbid personality that will determine what is required in a given situation and what help and support they will be willing to seek.

Thus, in psychiatry it is relevant to spend a good portion of the available time covering all the essential historical life events in some order.

It is also important to remember that while going through the process of history taking, we will naturally evoke certain behaviours, emotions, and responses from the patient, and gain some understanding of how the patient thinks, perceives, and believes. These observations form an essential part of the Mental State Examination, which is described in separate articles in this series.

Experienced clinicians move backwards and forwards during history taking, asking relevant questions about the patient's history or mental state as opportunities arise. There is a structured approach to a psychiatric assessment interview, but this structure is known to the physician — not to the patient. Sometimes a patient will be eager to talk about their hallucinations within the first few minutes of the interview and may not see any relevance in their personal development or employment history. Hence, it is reasonable to focus first on what the patient is most concerned about, and then follow the structured format to complete the history and Mental State Examination. Quiet, attentive listening on the part of the physician forms a very essential part of a psychiatric interview.

The Eight Key Headings of a Psychiatric History

The following are the key headings under which we expect to complete history taking in psychiatry. Each is explored in detail in Part 2 of this series:

  1. Presenting problems — the symptoms and concerns that have brought the patient to assessment, in their own words and in clinical terms.
  2. Past psychiatric history — previous episodes of mental illness, treatments received (including voluntary and involuntary admissions, medications, ECT, and psychotherapy), and response to treatment.
  3. Past medical history — physical health conditions, both current and historical, as well as current medications and allergies. Physical illness can cause, mimic, or exacerbate psychiatric conditions.
  4. Family history — mental and physical health in parents, siblings, and extended family members. There is a significant hereditary component to many psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression.
  5. Personal history — birth and early development, childhood, education, occupational history, relationships, sexual history, and reproductive history.
  6. Current social circumstances — housing, finances, social support, and relationships in the present day.
  7. Forensic history — contact with the criminal justice system, including arrests, charges, convictions, and any history of violence or aggression.
  8. Premorbid personality — the patient's characteristic way of thinking, feeling, and behaving before the onset of the current illness. This is best understood through both the patient's own self-description and an informant's account.

History Taking in Psychiatry continues in Part 2 — The Schema.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the "therapeutic alliance" and why does it matter in psychiatry?

The therapeutic alliance is the quality of the collaborative, trusting relationship between clinician and patient. It encompasses agreement on the goals of treatment, agreement on the tasks required to achieve those goals, and the emotional bond between the two parties. Meta-analyses consistently show the therapeutic alliance to be one of the strongest predictors of a good treatment outcome across a wide range of psychiatric conditions and treatment modalities. In practical terms, a good therapeutic alliance improves engagement, adherence to medication, willingness to disclose sensitive information, and willingness to engage in psychological therapy.

How long should a full psychiatric assessment take?

A full initial psychiatric assessment — covering all eight headings of history, a full mental state examination, risk assessment, and formulation — typically takes between 60 and 90 minutes for an experienced clinician, and may take longer for a trainee or when the history is complex. In emergency settings (such as A&E), a focused assessment covering the presenting problem, mental state, and risk may take 30 to 45 minutes. It is important to recognise when additional time or a follow-up appointment is needed to complete an assessment, rather than making premature clinical decisions with incomplete information.

Why is collateral history particularly important in psychiatry?

In many psychiatric conditions, the patient's own account of their symptoms and behaviour may be incomplete or unreliable — not because they are being dishonest, but because insight (awareness of being unwell) is often impaired. In psychosis, the patient may not recognise their beliefs as delusions. In mania, they may be unaware of the extent of their disinhibited behaviour. In dementia, the patient typically minimises or is genuinely unaware of their memory difficulties. Collateral history from family members, carers, or other professionals fills these gaps and is often indispensable for accurate diagnosis and safe management.

What is meant by "premorbid personality" and how do you assess it?

Premorbid personality refers to the patient's characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, relating, and behaving before the onset of their current mental health problems. It helps the clinician understand what "baseline" to aim for in recovery, whether personality traits may be contributing to the presentation (e.g. anxious premorbid personality in a patient presenting with generalised anxiety disorder), and whether a personality disorder may be present independently of the current episode. You assess it by asking the patient how they would have described themselves before becoming unwell, and by asking an informant (with consent) how they would describe the patient's personality. Structured approaches include the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) or the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) in research settings.

How do I ask about substance use sensitively?

Substance use history is essential in every psychiatric assessment as it can cause, mimic, or exacerbate almost any psychiatric condition. Ask about alcohol, cannabis, stimulants (cocaine, amphetamines), opioids, benzodiazepines, and novel psychoactive substances. The CAGE questionnaire (Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-opener) is a brief validated screen for alcohol problems. The AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) provides a more detailed quantitative assessment. The DAST (Drug Abuse Screening Test) screens for drug misuse. Normalise the questions — "I ask everyone about this" — and use open, non-judgmental language. Always document units per week, frequency, pattern of use, tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, and any previous attempts to cut down or abstain.

Should I always take a collateral history and how do I handle confidentiality?

While ideally you should always try to obtain at least one independent account, you must first have the patient's consent to contact a third party — unless there is a compelling reason to do so without consent (such as risk to life). If the patient consents, you can speak to a family member or carer. When doing so, be careful about what you disclose to the informant — you can receive information without disclosing the patient's clinical details. If the patient does not consent to any contact, document this and record the limitations it places on the assessment. In cases of impaired capacity or serious risk, the threshold for acting without consent is lower, and you should seek senior advice.

For an ST3 interview — what is the structure of a full psychiatric history?

A model answer would cover: personal details and reason for referral; history of presenting complaint (including onset, duration, precipitating factors, alleviating/exacerbating factors, and previous episodes); past psychiatric history; past medical history; family history; personal history (birth, development, education, occupational history, relationships, sexual history); current social circumstances; forensic history; premorbid personality; substance use history; and collateral history. You should also note that the mental state examination runs in parallel with history taking, and that risk assessment is embedded throughout — not left to the end. Demonstrating that you understand history taking as a dynamic and therapeutic process, rather than a simple data-collection exercise, will impress an examiner.

References

  1. Johnstone EC, et al. Companion to Psychiatric Studies (7th ed). Churchill Livingstone, 2004.
  2. Gelder M, Harrison P, Cowen P. Shorter Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry (6th ed). Oxford University Press, 2010.
  3. Semple D, Smyth R. Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry (4th ed). Oxford University Press, 2019.
  4. Sims A. Symptoms in the Mind: An Introduction to Descriptive Psychopathology (5th ed). Elsevier, 2015.
  5. Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 1979;16(3):252–260.
  6. NICE. Depression in Adults: Treatment and Management (NG222). NICE, 2022.
  7. World Health Organization. ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. WHO, Geneva, 1992.