The following document was written by Dr Satvir Singh FRANZCP (Aust), FRCPsych (UK), MSc (Lon), MRCPsych (UK), DPM, MBBS Consultant Psychiatrist & Lead Consultant for Undergraduate Medical Education (Psychiatry) Kent & Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust Canterbury, Kent in Dec 2007.
You may use the information here for personal use but if you intend to publish or present it, you must clearly credit the author and www.clinicaljunior.com
This site is not intended to be used by people who are not medically trained. Anyone using this site does so at their own risk and he/she assumes any and all liability. ALWAYS ASK YOUR SENIOR IF YOU ARE UNSURE ABOUT A PROCEDURE. NEVER CONDUCT A PROCEDURE YOU ARE UNSURE ABOUT.
“The examination of mental state is to do with the assessment and observation of one’s mental condition and related behaviour at a given point in time.”
It is usually carried out right at the end of the interview, once the History Taking task has been completed. However, the observation of the patient’s behaviour, affect, mood, thought process and his/her understanding with regard to the possible underlying factors responsible for his/her symptoms and behaviour and what treatment might help him/her remains a continuous process from the minute the patient walks into the room and until the consultation is over.
There is a standard systematic schema to evaluate the patient’s mental state, but in practice, a doctor will take the opportunity during the consultation to evaluate certain aspects of the mental health status of the patient.
Mental State Examination also allows the doctor to complete any gaps that might have been left unattended during the history taking, particularly the risk assessment for self-harm, etc.
The following is the order that we are trained to describe our patient’s mental state formally, although our observation of the facts could have been at different stages of the evaluation of the patient – in the waiting room, history taking and of course during the mental state examination, and indeed when the patient leaves the consulting room:
As in other branches of medicine, the abnormal findings of the mind are understood to be pathological and in psychiatry, they are collectively termed as “Psychopathology.” If an examiner asks to describe the psychopathology of a given patient, then our concern is only with the abnormal findings and observations about the patient’s mental state and related behaviour at the time of the assessment of the patient. All other behaviours, signs and symptoms will be recorded in history.
Once we have recorded the presenting psychopathology or absence of some key signs and symptoms, the next step is to understand or interpret the significance of the presenting psychopathology.
Here one records verbatim the patient’s description of his mood, thought process and perpetual abnormalities and then use the process of empathy to understand how the patient may be feeling with his/her described emotions, feelings, beliefs and other concerns.
2. PhenomenologyThis is patient’s personal understanding of his/her current psychopathology. As to why they are behaving in the manner that they are and the significance of their delusions and hallucinations.
3. Interpretative PsychopathologyThis is based on the interpretation and understanding of patient’s signs and symptoms (psychopathology), which is then categorised as the basis of preconceived theories. This process is largely employed by Analytic Psychotherapists in their clinical work.
4. Experimental PsychopathologyThis is where researchers would carry out scientific studies in controlled environment, such as inducing a certain behaviour response to a given stimulus. This method is often employed in Behavioural Psychotherapy to achieve a desired response or change in behaviour in a given situation.
In current medical and psychiatric practice, what is most relevant is to exclude the possibility of any underlying physical cause to the presenting psychopathology, such as acute onset of visual hallucinations in an older person, secondary to chest infection. Or, a history of chronic visual hallucinations in a blind or partially sighted person (Charles Bonnett Syndrome).
Finally, to carry out a Mental State Examination, we need the right environment to interview a patient and his/her co-operation and willingness to be examined. If a full Mental State Examination is not possible for whatever reason, then those reasons should be recorded and the interpretation drawn. A further attempt at an appropriate time, suitable to all concerned should be arranged.
The Process of Mental State Examination is in the next section – Mental State Examination – 2.
Author:
Dr Satvir Singh
FRANZCP (Aust), FRCPsych (UK), MSc (Lon), MRCPsych (UK), DPM, MBBS
Consultant Psychiatrist & Lead Consultant for Undergraduate Medical Education (Psychiatry)
Kent & Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust
Canterbury, Kent