Mental State Examination Series: Part 1 (Introduction)Part 2 (The Examination)

Introduction

In most branches of medicine, history taking is followed by physical examination, with each sub-specialty having its own unique method. In psychiatry, the mental state examination begins as soon as you see the patient and continues while you are painstakingly going through all the sub-headings of history taking. Sometimes only a few minutes are needed to complete the MSE formally, after most of the available time has been spent on history taking.

The Mental State Examination is, at its core, the keen observation of the patient's appearance, behaviour, and mood — followed by questions about their beliefs, any perceptual abnormalities, and then cognition, insight, and interpretation of findings.

An important distinction from physical examination is that in psychiatry, we also record what the patient thinks, feels, and believes about their own appearance, behaviour, and thought processes — and what they believe the underlying cause of their condition to be, and what treatment might help. In medicine, a patient may have no opinion about their pallor or raised JVP; in psychiatry, almost all patients have some personal interpretation of their signs and symptoms, and this often provides important diagnostic clues.

The key diagnostic challenge is the disparity or incongruity between the patient's complaints and their observed behaviour. A patient with dementia will often confidently deny any memory problems — yet moments later cannot recall the day of the week. A patient with anorexia nervosa will deny any concern about their weight — despite being markedly emaciated. These incongruities are themselves significant clinical findings.

When presenting a mental state, describe findings in plain, precise English. Avoid vague or pejorative terms such as "hysterical" or "bizarre." Quote the patient's own words verbatim where a key sign or symptom is being described. Mention both what is present and what is notably absent in support of your primary diagnosis.

Appearance and Behaviour

The patient's appearance and general behaviour may give important diagnostic clues. Observe and describe:

  • General appearance: estimated age (do they look older or younger than their stated age?), build, dress, and level of self-care and hygiene
  • Eye contact: maintained, intermittent, avoided, or intense
  • Psychomotor activity: agitation (inability to sit still, hand-wringing, pacing) or retardation (slowed movement and speech, long delays before answering); catatonic features (rigidity, waxy flexibility, posturing, negativism, echopraxia)
  • Rapport: the quality of the interpersonal connection — was it easy to establish rapport, or was the patient guarded, suspicious, dismissive, or hostile?
  • Behaviour: any unusual, stereotyped, or disorganised behaviour; evidence of responding to hallucinations (e.g. apparently listening to or talking to unseen others)

From hypomanic excitement to withdrawn depression; from paranoid guardedness to confused, unkempt self-neglect — the clinician's first observations often point strongly towards the diagnosis. The relatives' appearance and behaviour can also be informative: in hypomania, the patient often appears the most energetic in the room while the family appear exhausted; in dementia, the patient's "head-turning sign" — glancing repeatedly towards an anxious spouse for reassurance when answering questions — is a characteristic finding.

During home visits, the state of the home environment provides further valuable information: the tidiness of the living space, the state of the kitchen and refrigerator, whether pets are being adequately cared for, and how the patient greets you at the door.

Speech

In the MSE, the focus is on the form and quality of speech — not its content (which is addressed under Thought). Describe:

  • Rate: fast (pressure of speech, as in mania), slow (as in depression, sedation), or normal
  • Volume: loud, quiet, or normal
  • Tone and prosody: monotonous and flat (as in depression or negative symptoms of schizophrenia) or varied and expressive
  • Spontaneity: does the patient volunteer information spontaneously or give only minimal answers when directly questioned?
  • Fluency and articulation: any dysarthria (slurred speech, suggesting neurological cause or intoxication), dysphagia, or dysphonia
  • Neologisms: new words constructed by the patient, or existing words used with a private meaning (a feature of schizophrenia)
  • Poverty of speech: reduced amount of spontaneous speech (seen in depression, negative symptoms)

Speech abnormalities are commonly seen in neurological disorders, depression, mania, schizophrenia, and learning disability.

Affect and Mood

These terms are often confused. It is important to describe both:

  • Mood (subjective): the patient's own description of their prevailing emotional state — "I have felt low and hopeless for the last three months." Mood is a sustained emotional tone.
  • Affect (objective): the clinician's observation of the patient's immediate emotional responsiveness during the interview. A normal affect is warm and reactive, with appropriate facial expressions. Affect can be: blunted (reduced range and intensity of emotional expression), flat (absence of emotional expression), labile (rapidly shifting between states), or incongruent (not matching the stated mood or thought content — e.g. smiling while describing being suicidal, which may suggest psychosis or severe dissociation).
  • Euthymia refers to a normal, stable mood state.

Note: a patient may smile or laugh during the interview while their overall mood is deeply depressed — this is a brief fluctuation in affect, not an indication of mood. Brief fluctuations in affect are normal. It is only when a mood state is pervasive and correlates with significant functional impairment (at home, socially, and at work) that it is considered pathological.

Thought Process

Thought is examined across three dimensions:

Thought Form (How Thoughts Are Connected)

Disorders of thought form describe how thoughts are linked and communicated:

  • Flight of ideas: rapid movement from one topic to another, with discernible — but tenuous — connections (typically mania)
  • Loosening of associations (derailment): thoughts shift in an unpredictable, non-goal-directed way, with no logical connection between successive ideas (typical of schizophrenia)
  • Tangentiality: the patient begins to answer a question but drifts off-topic and never returns to the original point
  • Circumstantiality: the patient eventually reaches the goal of a thought, but via an excessive number of irrelevant details
  • Thought blocking: sudden interruption in the train of thought, with the patient unable to continue — they may describe the thought as being "removed from their mind" (passivity phenomenon; seen in schizophrenia)
  • Over-inclusive thinking: inability to exclude irrelevant material, leading to broadening and blurring of conceptual boundaries
  • Poverty of thought (alogia): markedly reduced quantity of thinking and speech, as seen in negative symptoms of schizophrenia or severe depression

Thought Content (What the Patient Is Thinking)

Disorders of thought content describe the abnormal ideas the patient holds:

  • Delusions: fixed false beliefs, firmly held with absolute conviction, out of keeping with the patient's cultural and educational background, and not amenable to reasoned argument. Types include: persecutory (most common), grandiose, referential (ideas of reference — the belief that ordinary events have special personal significance, e.g. a TV announcer is speaking directly to the patient), nihilistic (Cotard's delusion — the belief that one's body or world does not exist), somatic, erotomanic, jealous (Othello syndrome), and delusional perception (a normal perception is followed by an abnormal delusional interpretation). First-rank (Schneiderian) delusions — passivity of thought, thought insertion, thought withdrawal, thought broadcasting — are strongly associated with schizophrenia.
  • Overvalued ideas: an isolated, strongly held idea — not of delusional intensity — that dominates the patient's life (e.g. in anorexia nervosa or dysmorphophobia)
  • Obsessions: recurrent, intrusive, unwanted thoughts, images, or impulses that the patient recognises as their own but cannot dismiss, and which are experienced as distressing. Typically accompanied by compulsions in OCD.
  • Suicidal and homicidal ideation: always actively enquire about these and document the response clearly

Goal-Directedness of Thought

Whether the patient's thinking is goal-directed — able to reach a conclusion in a coherent, logical manner — reflects their capacity for attention, concentration, and executive function.

Perception

Perceptual abnormalities require systematic evaluation across each sensory modality. Key phenomena include:

Hallucinations

A hallucination is a perception in the absence of an external stimulus — experienced as real, arising in external space, and occurring in clear consciousness (not in the hypnagogic/hypnopompic state on falling asleep or waking). Types:

  • Auditory hallucinations — the most common type in schizophrenia. May be elementary (bangs, whispers) or complex (voices). Voices may speak to the patient (second person) or about the patient (third person — commenting or discussing). Command hallucinations (voices instructing the patient to act) carry significant risk. Specifically enquire: Is the voice clear and audible? Does it seem to come from outside the head? Does the patient recognise the voice? Is it one voice or several? Do the voices talk directly to the patient or about the patient? Does the patient feel compelled to obey?
  • Visual hallucinations — more strongly associated with organic causes (delirium, substance intoxication or withdrawal, dementia, epilepsy) than functional psychosis, though they can occur in schizophrenia
  • Olfactory hallucinations — smelling things others cannot; may suggest temporal lobe epilepsy or schizophrenia
  • Gustatory hallucinations — abnormal tastes
  • Tactile (somatic) hallucinations — sensations of being touched, or of insects crawling under the skin (formication — classically associated with cocaine and alcohol withdrawal)

Pseudohallucinations

Pseudohallucinations are experienced within internal or subjective space (e.g. "inside my head"), and the patient retains insight that they are not real perceptions. They are less diagnostically specific than true hallucinations.

Illusions

An illusion is a misinterpretation of a real external stimulus (e.g. seeing a shadow and believing it to be a person). Illusions may occur normally under conditions of fatigue, fear, or reduced sensory input, but persistent illusions may indicate delirium or intoxication.

Depersonalisation and Derealisation

Depersonalisation is the distressing experience of feeling detached from one's own thoughts, feelings, or body — as if an observer of oneself. Derealisation is the experience that the external world feels unreal, dreamlike, or remote. Both can occur as isolated phenomena (e.g. with fatigue, anxiety, cannabis use) or as features of depressive disorder, dissociative disorder, or complex PTSD.

Cognition

By the time you reach this point in the assessment, you will usually have formed a working impression of the patient's cognitive state from their performance throughout the interview. If the patient has had difficulty giving simple personal details or following the thread of the conversation, shift to a more detailed cognitive assessment early in the process rather than leaving it until the end.

The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE, Folstein 1975) is the most widely used brief screening tool and covers orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall, and language. Maximum score is 30; scores below 24 suggest cognitive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is more sensitive for mild cognitive impairment and includes executive function and visuospatial tasks.

Document orientation (time, place, person), attention (serial 7s, months of the year backwards), concentration, short-term and long-term memory, and — if indicated — language, praxis, and executive function. If cognitive impairment is detected, a full specialist dementia assessment should be arranged.

Insight and Judgement

Evaluation of the patient's insight is an important and often underappreciated aspect of the psychiatric examination. Insight is not a binary — present or absent — but a spectrum. It has several dimensions: does the patient recognise they are unwell? Do they attribute their experiences to a mental illness? Do they accept the need for treatment? Do they understand the effects of their illness on others?

Insight is significant for prognosis (those with better insight generally have better outcomes), for medication adherence, and for medicolegal decisions about capacity and the need for compulsory treatment.

Questions to elicit insight and judgement include:

  • What do you think is the problem here?
  • Do you feel that you may have some emotional or mental health issues that require help?
  • What do you think may be the underlying cause of your problem?
  • What investigations do you think might be helpful?
  • What are your views on the best treatment options?
  • Who else do you think should be involved in managing your care?

The patient's responses to these questions will also help you decide whether they can be treated as an outpatient or may require hospital treatment, and whether they can be treated informally or whether compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act may need to be considered.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between affect and mood?

Mood is the patient's sustained, subjective emotional state — what they describe feeling over a period of time. Affect is the clinician's observation of the patient's immediate emotional responsiveness during the interview — the outward expression of emotion moment-to-moment. A patient may have a persistently low mood (subjective) while displaying a reactive, almost normal affect during an engaging interview conversation. The distinction is clinically significant: a flat or blunted affect may suggest negative symptoms of schizophrenia; an incongruent affect (e.g. laughing while describing being suicidal) may suggest psychosis.

What is a delusion and how does it differ from an overvalued idea?

A delusion is a fixed, false belief held with absolute conviction, out of keeping with the patient's cultural background, and not amenable to logical argument. An overvalued idea is a strongly held, understandable belief that dominates the patient's thinking and behaviour but does not meet the criteria for a delusion — the patient may have some doubt, or the belief may be based on real experiences that have been given excessive weight. In practice, distinguishing between the two can be difficult; the key is the degree of conviction and the extent to which the belief is fixed and unshakeable despite evidence to the contrary.

What are Schneiderian first-rank symptoms of schizophrenia?

Kurt Schneider (1959) proposed a set of symptoms that, if present in the absence of an organic cause, were highly suggestive of schizophrenia. They include: thought insertion (thoughts being placed in the mind by an external force), thought withdrawal (thoughts being removed from the mind), thought broadcasting (thoughts being heard by others), passivity phenomena (the experience that one's feelings, impulses, or actions are controlled by an external force), somatic passivity (bodily sensations imposed by an external agency), delusional perception (a two-stage phenomenon: a normal percept followed by an abnormal delusional meaning), and hearing voices discussing or commenting on the patient in the third person. While ICD-11 and DSM-5 have moved away from giving them exclusive diagnostic significance, first-rank symptoms remain clinically valuable and should be asked about systematically in any patient with suspected psychosis.

Why are command hallucinations clinically important?

Command hallucinations — auditory hallucinations that instruct the patient to carry out specific actions — are clinically significant because of their potential to drive dangerous behaviour. The commands may instruct the patient to harm themselves or others. Research shows that while many patients do not act on command hallucinations, those who believe the voice is powerful, authoritative, or benevolent, or who have a relationship with the voice, are more likely to comply. Command hallucinations should always be asked about as part of the risk assessment and documented carefully, including the nature of the command, whether the patient feels compelled to obey, and any previous compliance.

What is thought blocking and how does it differ from poverty of thought?

Thought blocking is a sudden, unexpected interruption in the train of thought — the patient's mind goes "blank" and they are unable to continue the thought. It may be accompanied by a passivity experience in which the patient believes their thoughts have been removed. It is characteristically seen in schizophrenia. Poverty of thought (alogia) is a quantitative reduction in the amount of spontaneous thought and speech — the patient says little, and their thinking appears empty or slowed. It is a negative symptom of schizophrenia and is also seen in severe depression. The distinction is important: thought blocking involves a discrete, sudden interruption, while poverty of thought involves a generally reduced quantity of thinking throughout the interview.

How do I assess cognitive function quickly in a busy clinical setting?

In a busy setting, a rapid bedside cognitive assessment can be performed in under five minutes. Check orientation (day, date, month, year, current location — score out of 5), registration (ask the patient to repeat three items immediately), attention (serial subtractions: 100 minus 7, five times; or spell "WORLD" backwards), recall (after five minutes, ask for the three items again), and brief language assessment (ask the patient to name two objects). Any failures warrant formal cognitive testing with the MMSE or MoCA at the earliest opportunity. Always document the context — a frightened patient in a noisy A&E will perform less well than a calm patient in clinic.

For an ST3 interview — how would you examine a patient's thought content?

A strong answer would systematically cover: the patient's current preoccupations and worries; the presence of suicidal or homicidal ideation (always ask directly); depressive cognitions (hopelessness, worthlessness, guilt); delusions (persecutory, referential, grandiose, nihilistic, and first-rank phenomena such as thought insertion, withdrawal, and broadcasting); obsessions and compulsions; ideas of reference; and overvalued ideas. Demonstrate that you understand how to ask about these topics sensitively and without planting ideas (e.g. "Do you ever have experiences that others might find hard to believe?" rather than "Do you have delusions?"). Showing that you can integrate thought content findings with the broader clinical picture — explaining, for example, how persecutory delusions increase the risk of violence — demonstrates clinical integration.

References

  1. Johnstone EC, et al. Companion to Psychiatric Studies (7th ed). Churchill Livingstone, 2004.
  2. Gelder M, Harrison P, Cowen P. Shorter Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry (6th ed). Oxford University Press, 2010.
  3. Semple D, Smyth R. Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry (4th ed). Oxford University Press, 2019.
  4. Sims A. Symptoms in the Mind: An Introduction to Descriptive Psychopathology (5th ed). Elsevier, 2015.
  5. Schneider K. Clinical Psychopathology. Translated by Hamilton MW. Grune & Stratton, 1959.
  6. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12(3):189–198.
  7. Nasreddine ZS, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005;53(4):695–699.
  8. World Health Organization. ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. WHO, Geneva, 1992.
  9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). APA, 2013.